Poker Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for serious players and enthusiasts of poker. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Player1 K♣T♣

Player2 K♥T♥

Board is A♣ Q♦ J♥ 4♣

This one is most common, what are the few others(most common)?

share|improve this question
Out of curiosity, I'd like to know what you or others might gain from having this question answered. What use would it be? – Toby Booth Apr 25 '12 at 3:18

Freerolling implies having an exact same hand made as your opponent plus drawing to a better hand that your opponent cannot make. "Most common" simply means that some situations would have a higher statistical probablility than the others.

IMO the term can only be applied during a showdown or in a later analysis i.e. only after you have seen the opponent's cards. Knowing statistically most common situations will not improve your game - when you have a made straight and a flush draw, the opponent could be on a higher flush draw even without the straight etc. etc.; just play the odds as you normally would.

share|improve this answer
You can absolutely know that you are freerolling, if you have the nuts and a draw to better nuts. That said, I agree that it's not relevant to your play in hold'em. It can be in Omaha. – Jeffrey Blake May 16 '12 at 14:56
@JeffreyBlake: What about if you have a nut straight, are drawing to a nut flush but your opponent has three-of-a-kind and is drawing to full house or quads? Regardless of still having favourable odds, I don't believe this situation qualifies to be called a freeroll. Am I wrong? – o.v. May 16 '12 at 22:06
No, that would not qualify as freerolling because your opponent has good outs to beat you as well. I think truely meaningful freerolling situations happen the most in split pot games. – Jeffrey Blake May 16 '12 at 23:32
@JeffreyBlake: that's exactly my thinking. And, since you can't confidently know if your opponent is drawing to such a hand, you can't know you're freerolling for a fact. As I speculated in the answer above, the term "free-rolling" could only be applied after the hands have been revealed, (somewhat similar to commenting on someone "drawing dead" - you can't know you're drawing dead until you see the opponent's cards... otherwise you wouldn't call would you? :) – o.v. May 16 '12 at 23:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.