I don't play HU but tried to play one game at 10NL. I can't remember exact numbers but we both started with 10$ stack and played many hands until I took his all stack. I left table with ~14-15$. Is it just seems to me that is harder to beat rake at HU then full or 6max ring because money is constantly changing owner and every pot is raked.
|
The more players, the more money on the table. The rake is less noticed. Be aware that:
|
||||
|
|
|
You're probably better off playing in a head's up Sit 'n' Go game. Then, it won't matter how many hands you play because you simply pay the one-time tournament fee. For example, on one of the online poker sites, the $10 head's up SnG game is $10+$0.50. You and your opponent pay $0.50 each as "rake". The winner gets the loser's $10 no matter how many hands you play. In your case, you would've won an additional ~$5-$6 if you had gone this route. |
|||||||
|
|
Well, think about it: if you're heads'up, then the rake is basically from both player's stack since in most heads'up matches, almost all hands are played (super wide range). If you are in a full ring game (9 players), then maybe you play AT MOST 25 % of the hands. In this case, only in that small percetange of hands rake is taken from your stack / pot. So you will feel the rake a lot later. Also, in full ring games, there are situations (not that rare) where more than 2 players go to the showdown with their hands, which means rake is taken from all of them. |
|||||
|
