meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | Jul 18 '12 at 15:15 | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
|
Jan 10 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jun 6 |
answered | What software to use when playing online? |
|
Apr 20 |
comment |
Easy to memorize starting hand strategy Are we sure we want to vote this for closing? There are, sadly, very few questions on poker.SE and this looks like a perfectly valid question: starting hand charts and "memo-technique" tricks to remember them may be a cool addition to the site. To me it's a +1 and not a vote for close. Also, at this point and seen the low trafic here I think downvote and vote for close should be commented... |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
NL600: River Decision IP vs TAG 3 Barrel @Toby Booth: I'm not asking for opponent's cards but what did you end up doing? |
|
Apr 11 |
comment |
NL600: River Decision IP vs TAG 3 Barrel @Toby Booth: effective stacks are $889 and he already put $401 in, so he has $488 left. If you put him allin if I did correct calcs there shall be $1259 in the pot and he would get about 3:1 on his call. If he has a little something (which I think is very often the case), it would come down to how often he thinks you're making a move here (after calling preflop, flop and turn). But anyway, to me after a passive preflop, flop and turn the river is not the time to be aggressive: you don't represent a 4, nor an A (AK would 3-bet pre or fold later on, AQ would raise, AJ would fold, etc.). |
|
Apr 11 |
answered | NL600: River Decision IP vs TAG 3 Barrel |
|
Apr 9 |
revised |
Why does 555 beat QQQ in this Doyle vs Elezra hand? Detailed the answer a bit more |
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Why does 555 beat QQQ in this Doyle vs Elezra hand? +1... I edited your answer a bit. (erf, editing my comment: I don't have full edit rights yet on poker.stackexchange.com so my edit needs peer-reviewing ; ) |
|
Apr 8 |
suggested | suggested edit on Why does 555 beat QQQ in this Doyle vs Elezra hand? |
|
Apr 3 |
comment |
In Omaha, Is it allowed to only show two holecards at showdown when claiming the pot? oh ok +1... So I didn't see things either ; ) Oh well, I take it that this summer (where I plan to play some live Omaha) I'll ask too when sitting down! |
|
Apr 3 |
comment |
In Omaha, Is it allowed to only show two holecards at showdown when claiming the pot? Note that I've been playing poker since a long time and I typically help people here... But I figured out I've never played live Omaha and was a bit surprised to see people apparently only showing two holecards once in a while (I've always seen four, in online Omaha) so I figured out this may make a nice SE question : ) |
|
Apr 3 |
asked | In Omaha, Is it allowed to only show two holecards at showdown when claiming the pot? |
|
Apr 2 |
comment |
Are there times when your bets are more important than your cards at poker? can you rephrase your question? What do you mean by "Cards rules, whatever bets goes on..."? What does "Cards rules" mean? |
|
Mar 31 |
comment |
Redealing to the board in Pot Limit Omaha @Kyle: I edited mine... At first I wasn't sure you were talking about "running it twice" because you didn't mention the action up to the flop / all-ins : ) |
|
Mar 31 |
revised |
Redealing to the board in Pot Limit Omaha deleted 52 characters in body |
|
Mar 27 |
answered | Redealing to the board in Pot Limit Omaha |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts @amigal: ah ah, thanks... But I've got no merit: I've been forced to deal with all this for a poker software I'm developing (a tracker & HUD) ; ) In some case it's tricky because some sites do not write out the side pots details (only the total pot amount is shown) and it's kinda tricky to determine the pot sizes (which is important, for example, if you want to compute the all-in expected value, etc.). : ) |
|
Mar 25 |
revised |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts added 457 characters in body |
|
Mar 25 |
answered | Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts |
|
Mar 24 |
comment |
Ante + BB all-in, what can the BB win? as I just commented to amigal, "You are entitled to win only as much as you put in times the number of players" doesn't mean much unless you define what "put in" means. Because one can "put in" a penalty blind and that one does definitely not count "times the number of players". A penalty blind is "put in" yet it is lost. It could have been the case that the ante was computed just like a penalty blind (not that it's a penalty, but simply that it could have not counted towards matching the big blind)... (hence my question). |
