meta user
network profile
| bio | website | amazon.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Seattle, WA | |
| age | 25 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | yesterday | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
In a past life I was a profitable No Limit Texas Hold'em player on Full Tilt at the NL25 level (that's a dime and a quarter for blinds; the top... of microstakes :)). Between 2008-2010 I played just shy of 300,000 hands.
In 2010-2011 I played live poker for over 600 hours at 1-2 and 2-5 in Foxwoods, Las Vegas, and a few other casinos.
Since then (and since graduating college) I've moved on to another stage of my life, but still enjoy thinking and playing occasionally on weekends, when time permits.
|
May 5 |
revised |
Interesting Spot in Penny Poker: Overpair vs Nit on Wet Board deleted 1 characters in body |
|
May 5 |
comment |
Interesting Spot in Penny Poker: Overpair vs Nit on Wet Board I'm surprised at your preflop range; I wouldn't think it would be so top-heavy given stacks and both players positions. Possible though you are going off the fact that he is too inept an opponent to notice. |
|
May 5 |
awarded | Editor |
|
May 5 |
comment |
Interesting Spot in Penny Poker: Overpair vs Nit on Wet Board I disagree that players this low aren't competent these days; seems like the .02/.04 players from today are the .10/.25 players from 3 years ago, who are the 1/2-3/6 players from a few years before that. Running 12/8 are pretty solid stats for full ring, if a little nitty, and that leads me to believe he's good enough to at least notice deep stacks and his position. |
|
May 5 |
revised |
Interesting Spot in Penny Poker: Overpair vs Nit on Wet Board Thought process rather than conclusions. |
|
May 5 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
May 5 |
answered | Interesting Spot in Penny Poker: Overpair vs Nit on Wet Board |
|
Mar 29 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Mar 16 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
