network profile
| bio | website | reddit.com/users/philluminati |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 1 month |
| seen | Mar 26 '12 at 23:13 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
|
Mar 26 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Mar 26 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts This is a brilliant answer @TacticalCoder. I always figured that because you could work out a ratio in hindsight, you could work it out upfront but now I can see that you can't. Thank you. |
|
Mar 26 |
accepted | Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts |
|
Mar 25 |
awarded | Student |
|
Mar 25 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Mar 25 |
revised |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts added 978 characters in body |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts It's worth me commenting that to win against a 39 unit pot, having gone all in with 6 units to win back less than 7 is a bit questionable.. which is why I post my understanding of the logic here. |
|
Mar 25 |
asked | Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts |
