271 reputation
6
bio website
location
age
visits member for 11 months
seen May 19 at 19:12
stats profile views 0

May
2
accepted 1/2 NL: Call this villain's all-in with top pair, ace kicker?
May
2
comment 1/2 NL: Call this villain's all-in with top pair, ace kicker?
I concur that a preflop re-raise, on my part, was in order. As to calling the all-in, I want to clarify that I didn't assume he was fish because he came from the online world. I observed that he was playing 3-4 hands per orbit and relying on aggressive betting in a passive environment to take down pots. Thus, I wasn't prepared to assume his raises just meant strong hands. The fact that his typical raise was $2 and K9d is what made him jump to a $13 raise indicates some over-valuing IMO. Having said that, I concur his all-in should have been a sign that he was strong.
Apr
30
awarded  Commentator
Apr
30
comment 1/2 NL: Call this villain's all-in with top pair, ace kicker?
I was on the button; I updated the question in the pre-flop section to indicate our table positions.
Apr
30
revised 1/2 NL: Call this villain's all-in with top pair, ace kicker?
added 75 characters in body
Apr
29
revised 1/2 NL: Call this villain's all-in with top pair, ace kicker?
edited tags
Apr
29
asked 1/2 NL: Call this villain's all-in with top pair, ace kicker?
Dec
2
accepted Should I call all-in here with bottom set?
Nov
8
revised Should I have went all-in with KK on this flop?
added 457 characters in body
Nov
5
comment Should I have went all-in with KK on this flop?
I think your analysis here is spot on, particularly the risk of putting in 1/3 of my stack pre-flop.
Nov
5
accepted Should I have went all-in with KK on this flop?
Nov
5
comment Should I call all-in here with bottom set?
I appreciate all the feedback. I've updated the question with an epilogue that reveals what happened.
Nov
5
revised Should I call all-in here with bottom set?
added 428 characters in body
Nov
3
asked Should I call all-in here with bottom set?
Nov
3
asked Should I have went all-in with KK on this flop?
Oct
30
comment 200nl - Flop top two on wet board and get squeezed OOP deep
@SoboLAN Why don't you consider a straight a possibility for UTG+1? I've seen players re-raise big when flopping a straight on a flush draw board, since they're afraid of an opponent hitting the third spade.
Oct
3
comment NL100: 2-Pair In 4-Way Pot Facing OOP Lead @ Wet Flop
I don't see CO and BTN being in the hand as a problem; CO didn't even raise 3x the big blind pre-flop. Furthermore, with a flop like this, I'd want to thin out my opponents as much as possible. Can you clarify why you think raising here is a problem with CO and BTN remaining?
Oct
2
awarded  Teacher
Oct
2
answered NL100: 2-Pair In 4-Way Pot Facing OOP Lead @ Wet Flop
Aug
30
accepted Could I have won more money with top set on the flop?