meta user
network profile
| bio | website | bigbetsoftware.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 10 months |
| seen | Apr 13 at 13:19 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
I am an independent developer interested in startups, gambling software (especially poker), and web technologies. I write mostly JavaScript these days, most recently multiplayer games leveraging Web Sockets.
|
Jul 16 |
revised |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts added 74 characters in body |
|
Jul 16 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Jul 16 |
comment |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts Your method is error-prone and difficult to maintain. Check my answer :). |
|
Jul 16 |
revised |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts deleted 2 characters in body |
|
Jul 16 |
revised |
Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts deleted 2 characters in body |
|
Jul 16 |
answered | Complex split pot semantics for multiple All-In winners with differing amounts |
|
Jul 15 |
comment |
What is a 'wet board'? Yeah, it's kind of arbitrary semantics, but from a teaching perspective texture comes way before ranges (at least a deep understanding), so it might be overload to take what is essentially "How scary is this board?" and turn it into a multi-step mental exercise. I think advanced players talk about action logic more than board categorization anyway. |
|
Jul 15 |
comment |
What is a 'wet board'? I mean that I prefer to use the term wet solely to describe the texture property of a board irrespective of opponent ranges. Otherwise it's confusing to call a board like [9d 8d 7s] dry in, say, a 4-bet pot where Villain can only have {AA-QQ,AK}. In those cases I simply say, "The board is wet but misses Villain's range." |
|
Jul 15 |
comment |
How does an opponent's all-in range change after showing an all-in bluff in an online heads-up tournament? Ordinarily there is a Bayesian way to think about this, but with the psychological dynamic (Villain knows he showed a bluff) there isn't going to be a non-speculative answer to this question without further play to figure out your opponent. More relevantly, when you see a similar move, the range of hands Villain can credibly have (and thus represent) depend on the previous action and the board. |
|
Jul 15 |
comment |
Profitability of re-buys/add-ons when allowed Sorry, but this is not accurate in two ways. First, you can't talk about money per chip without considering the effects of survival odds. Secondly, for an arbitrary field size the money equity does not depend on the payout structure even for winner-take-all tournaments (but the variance does). |
|
Jul 15 |
revised |
Profitability of re-buys/add-ons when allowed elaboration |
|
Jul 15 |
answered | What are Pot Odds, and how do I determine them? |
|
Jul 14 |
comment |
Is there a comprehensive source for poker terminology? pokerterms.com is user contributed and includes a lot of informal terms, so it should be pretty comprehensive. |
|
Jul 14 |
answered | What is a 'wet board'? |
|
Jul 14 |
revised |
NL200 Zoom: Top 2-Pair Deepstacked @ Wet Board added 58 characters in body |
|
Jul 14 |
answered | NL200 Zoom: Top 2-Pair Deepstacked @ Wet Board |
|
Jul 14 |
revised |
How to maximize expectation with pocket aces and an Aces Cracked bonus running added 3 characters in body |
|
Jul 13 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Jul 13 |
comment |
How to maximize expectation with pocket aces and an Aces Cracked bonus running I hope the last bit clears up the turn line. Sorry about the mess of a post - I came in with a bias about this type of bonus. |
|
Jul 13 |
revised |
How to maximize expectation with pocket aces and an Aces Cracked bonus running added 1162 characters in body |
