| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | New York, United States | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 5 months |
| seen | Feb 28 at 18:52 | |
| stats | profile views | 0 |
I'm a software developer at Stack Exchange in New York City and work on Stack Overflow Careers 2.0.
I love continuous delivery. Huge end-of-milestone deployments are awful. Shipping every day is fun.
Today, I use MVC, SQL, Redis and a bunch of JavaScript frameworks to get the job done. Tomorrow, I might be using something completely different.
|
Dec 11 |
comment |
Player very low on chips, can't pay Ante+BB. What happens? Makes sense - thanks! |
|
Dec 11 |
comment |
Trying to express NL betting rules formally, did I miss anything? @Chris: great, thanks for the clarification! |
|
Dec 11 |
comment |
Trying to express NL betting rules formally, did I miss anything? Ok, let's wait for more comments. |
|
Dec 9 |
comment |
Trying to express NL betting rules formally, did I miss anything? Thanks for your feedback! Regarding "they do not have the option to raise" - maybe I'm wrong, but I thought those are the rules. Example: post-flop, three players. A bets 100. B raises all-in to 130 (doesn't reopen - so A is still the OP). C calls 130. Now the action is back on the OP (A), so the betting would normally be completed. But since there was a non-reopening all-in raise by B, some players might still have to call the all-in raise. In this case, A still needs to put in 30 more chips to call the all-in, but can't re-raise anymore. - Correct? |