| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 6 months |
| seen | 10 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 2 |
|
Jun 6 |
comment |
Fictitious play for multiway hand in push or fold regime great! thanx @Inafzieger |
|
Apr 4 |
comment |
Easy to remember push/fold/callpush table/formula @RaduMurzea when you start using formulas, begins to understanding the nature of things. |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
Gap concept and pot odds @TTT look at this gottatalkpoker.com/GTP_odds.pdf Suppose you define monster as "at least two pair" you need at least 48.5 to 1 odds. |
|
Mar 24 |
comment |
Gap concept and pot odds @TTT actually it's not true. looks at my answer. the request of equity in relation to the number of players narrows the range playable. |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
How is Poker a game of skill? wow, a lot of math skilled players :). I know that the math here is not correct, but what I would show is the exceptionality of the occurence of the event. This is a binomial event, if we call W the numbers of wins and L the number of looses, we have that the probability of this even is BinCoeff(W+L,W)P^W(1-P)^L. If P is very small the order of magnitude of this event is P^W. @Cory This is a binomial event, in such case standart deviation(that is = NP(1-P)) can't be greater (in value) than mean = NP where N=W+L. |
|
Mar 16 |
comment |
Why is “Let There Be Range” so expensive ? Is it worth that money? You can take a look by yourself. Indeed is available on internet at this URL gamblingsystem.biz/books/… |
|
Mar 6 |
comment |
Converting Backdoor Draws Into Equity Thanx. Very good theoritical answer, but I am looking for a quick and dirty method of converting backdoor draws in outs counting. |
|
Mar 6 |
comment |
Converting Backdoor Draws Into Equity Thanx, I am sorry for my poor english. |
|
Feb 22 |
comment |
The groups of Sklansky starting hands with the term 'computer generated' i am referring to the preflop jam equity of the hole cards against a fixed numbers of opponents forced to call the jam. |
|
Feb 20 |
comment |
New school and old school ok, I am sorry. |
|
Feb 11 |
comment |
Effect of number of players in the probability distribution of poker hands I don't think that will be any reversal, because the rank depends only by the number of cards and how many cards you can change (none in this case). Anyway you can test it by a simple montecarlo simulation. R has a library for texas holdem. You can measure the frequency for straight and flush on changing the number of players. |
|
Feb 8 |
comment |
Gap concept and pot odds I have good equity in the pot ;) |
|
Feb 6 |
comment |
How to use fpdb HUD in the game The last doubt. PF3 I guess is the 3-bet preflop. The source page define it as PF3=Three bet preflop/3rd. How can I relate this number with distribution of hand with which the oppo will 3-bet? PFR*PF3 ? |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
How to use fpdb HUD in the game In the first line of the box displayed, are present 3 numbers. The first is vpip, the second is pfr, but the third what represents? |
|
Jan 28 |
comment |
How to use fpdb HUD in the game ok, I have added a link to the project web site. |
|
Jan 27 |
comment |
How to use fpdb HUD in the game I have tried to search for a tutorial, but in vain. I have found a lot a installation/configuration tutorials, but none about how to use in the game. I guess that the statistics used in this HUD is in some way a standart for poker players, so the developers has not spent extra time in developing further documentation. |
|
Jan 23 |
comment |
Gap concept and pot odds This kind statistics concerns with what people does (especially if they strightforward apply Sklansky theory). Conversely pot odds concern with what is correct to do from the mathematical point of view. In my little experience of rounder I found more economical advantageous play looking at the pot odds. Thanx for the answer but my doubt is still there. |
|
Jan 7 |
comment |
Nash's ICM calculation Thanx Soner, but I know the definition of Nash equilibrium. The question is about how to use ICM model in order to solve Nash equilibrium for many players on texas hold'em. |
|
Dec 23 |
comment |
Position advantage on the table and odds you right Toby Booth. Thanx, my english is not so good :) |
|
Dec 20 |
comment |
The state of the art of the pokerbots of poker academy The question is about how goods the poker academy pro are in playing poker not about they works. In my opinion your answer is good but almost not pertinent. |