Reputation
Next tag badge:
82/100 score
20/20 answers
Badges
2 11 37
Newest
 Nice Answer
Impact
~66k people reached

Sep
10
comment Research on the effect of a screen name or avatar in online poker
Feel free to have a go and answer your own question ;)
Sep
10
comment Research on the effect of a screen name or avatar in online poker
Gathering evidence on this would be heavily subjective, anecdotal, and prone to confirmation bias. Almost impossible to quantify in a meaningful way.
Sep
7
reviewed Reject When to fold AA pre-flop?
Sep
3
reviewed Edit How To Recognize Addiction To Gambling?
Sep
3
revised How To Recognize Addiction To Gambling?
Narrowed the scope of the question as a similar "tilt" related question already exists
Sep
2
reviewed Reviewed How can I use a player's decision to check blindly on the flop as a tell?
Sep
1
reviewed Looks OK Simplest Way to Explain EV to Beginners
Sep
1
comment Simplest Way to Explain EV to Beginners
Could you provide some depth to the answer. Perhaps examples, some descriptive calculations. Thanks.
Sep
1
reviewed Reviewed Simplest Way to Explain EV to Beginners
Sep
1
comment Simplest Way to Explain EV to Beginners
This is too short, so here is my quick "answer". Try explaining to yourself, simply but no simpler than is necessary. Write it down, keep honing and refining it. Put a few attempts up on the "chat" area, and maybe we can help. I'd be pleased to.
Aug
30
answered How can I use a player's decision to check blindly on the flop as a tell?
Aug
30
comment How can I use a player's decision to check blindly on the flop as a tell?
As ever, showdown evidence of a hand will say a lot about his thinking. Did you ever get that far?
Aug
29
reviewed Reviewed What I did was right?
Aug
25
comment NL100: Deep Stack Shoves On River. Do You Call?
What would you define as a "significant" overbet?
Aug
24
comment NL100: Deep Stack Shoves On River. Do You Call?
Against the full range you state, I have 93.20% eq. Against the villains "nut-range" derived from his full range you state, I have 69.44% eq. That's assuming he plays all hands this way, which is unlikely. Also, I did screw the calc up, doh! But, 370.80/204.80=1.81-to-1. In percentage terms, thats 1/(1.81+1)=36%. I still can't see how you got 41.64%?! I very much like to see the calculation, thanks.
Aug
24
reviewed Looks OK What % of tournament winners do it without going all in
Aug
24
comment What % of tournament winners do it without going all in
Do you have any sources for that information? What about additional info, like finishing positions related to playing tendencies?
Aug
24
comment NL100: Deep Stack Shoves On River. Do You Call?
First, equity is probably the wrong term as it's the river. I'm either winning or losing, no in between. Thus it comes down to number of winning combos vs losing combos. Also, how are you getting that number?! 41.64%? Edit the answer if the calc is too long for a comment :)
Aug
23
revised NL100: Deep Stack Shoves On River. Do You Call?
edited body
Aug
23
comment NL100: Deep Stack Shoves On River. Do You Call?
@Halvard You're right! Typo :) editing now.