meta user
network profile
| bio | website | twitter.com/tmte |
|---|---|---|
| location | London, United Kingdom | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | 2 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 31 |
Follow me on Twitter @tmte for some interesting stuff.
|
Feb 11 |
accepted | In deep stacked NLHE cash games, in what way do the implied odds of my starting hands change vs shallow stacked games? And why? |
|
Feb 11 |
revised |
Las Vegas: Best casino for 1-2 no limit? Changed tags, improved grammar. |
|
Feb 11 |
asked | NL200: Deep Stacked IP; 4Bet pot |
|
Feb 11 |
reviewed | Approve suggested edit on How does Lo work in Omaha Hi-Lo |
|
Feb 9 |
awarded | Enthusiast |
|
Feb 4 |
comment |
Call river all-in after missing flush-draw but hitting AK? @JohnDibling If you can quantify your comment, and put it into a full answer it could be useful. |
|
Feb 3 |
comment |
NL400: Vs a TAG Regular. Interesting River Decision I bet the turn for value because I believe I still have enough equity to make it +EV. As for the river, it does change a few things which I noted in my answer. I actually think c/f is best now that his range is more defined than at the turn. |
|
Feb 3 |
revised |
NL400: Vs a TAG Regular. Interesting River Decision added 3 characters in body |
|
Feb 2 |
revised |
NL400: Vs a TAG Regular. Interesting River Decision improved formatting |
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? @CheckRaise In 6max NL600 where this was, 27/22 is more the norm. Also I agree, it's not true tight-TAG. That's why I called him a "semi-tight...TAG". It's subjective of course but that's the terminology I use to differentiate the in-betweeners. |
|
Feb 2 |
comment |
Call river all-in after missing flush-draw but hitting AK? @CheckRaise "Why do you think AQx is discounted?" Because of the Pre-Flop action. Also, he's closing the action after OP has raised and everyone involved still calls, so I'd still count all the A3x's due to the IO he's now getting. |
|
Feb 1 |
comment |
Set Mining: betting pre flop with 22+ Sounds normal to me for a live 1-2 game :) The strategy you mention is definitely one you can derive from what I've said. And it sounds fine to me for that type of game. If it's over 175bb deep and as passive as you say I'd consider a ~5-7xbb open bet as a good start, although thats probably what you're doing already. |
|
Feb 1 |
awarded | Citizen Patrol |
|
Feb 1 |
suggested | suggested edit on What online poker sites charge/rake the least? |
|
Feb 1 |
revised |
Set Mining: betting pre flop with 22+ Improved grammar. |
|
Feb 1 |
comment |
Set Mining: betting pre flop with 22+ You're misinterpreting what i'm saying, but I'll go over it again to clear it up. |
|
Feb 1 |
comment |
Set Mining: betting pre flop with 22+ @JohnDibling Yeah, that's what I said. |
|
Feb 1 |
revised |
Set Mining: betting pre flop with 22+ added 62 characters in body |
|
Jan 31 |
answered | Set Mining: betting pre flop with 22+ |
|
Jan 31 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? It wasn't a snap call. It wasn't a lengthy decision either. |
