meta user
network profile
| bio | website | twitter.com/tmte |
|---|---|---|
| location | London, United Kingdom | |
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | 5 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 31 |
Follow me on Twitter @tmte for some interesting stuff.
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? @Johndibling so you agree that I do in fact up vote answers, and if youve read the meta post I've linked (perhaps you can help answer it), you'd understand why "accepting is a technical dilemma. Ty for your answer anyway, really. |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
Optimal Win Rate Standard Deviation OOPS! ;D Ignore the second part of my comment. |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? Why would you think that 3-betting Pre-Flop is "definitely" better than flatting? Also, as for reads on villain, that's not necessarily true. His quality is part due to his balance of bluffs to value hands. He's good because he's difficult to read. The number of hands is somewhat arbitrary as he may exploit others obviously, but that doesn't necessarily apply to how he reacts to me. |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg?"He's not worried about kicker problems with Ax anymore." Why not? |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? Specifically, what proportion of my hands do you think have a queen in them (compared with my whole range), that I would check-raise with? When would I do this and why? Thanks. |
|
Jan 30 |
revised |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? Additional information. |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
Optimal Win Rate Standard Deviation Yes, other than actually counting the hands you could do that. Also, consider determining your profitability in a game by Money Won Per Hour (or $Won/Hr). I find this a useful measure alongside bb win-rate to gauge my success. |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
Optimal Win Rate Standard Deviation Not to put you off but we're talking 100,000's to truly feel comfortable with the StDev volatility measure. It's not impossible to gain insight into your game using this stat, but it's genuinely difficult as the games change periodically. Thus one sample of hands and the corresponding StDev represent more of a snapshot in time, rather than a linear progression of an attribute of skill. |
|
Jan 30 |
answered | Optimal Win Rate Standard Deviation |
|
Jan 30 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? @Dan Firstly, I do appreciate your answer. Secondly, how do you know I don't upvote answers? You have definitive proof!? Otherwise it's terrible for your credibility. If you're going to make statements like that I really hope you can back them up! Thirdly, Check this link on Poker Meta out for an idea of why I haven't accepted answers YET. Thanks. |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
NL600: River Decision OOP vs Thinking Regular At Very Wet Board @karl Mostly, because I don't expect to get called by worse and my hand has postflop potential. 3 betting would ruin both those advantages. |
|
Jan 29 |
comment |
NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? Do you care to elaborate on your thought process. |
|
Jan 28 |
asked | NL600: Should I Make This River Bluff vs Reg? |
|
Jan 27 |
revised |
added 64 characters in body |
|
Jan 27 |
suggested | suggested edit on |
|
Jan 27 |
wiki | |
|
Jan 27 |
revised |
What is the purpose of a continuation bet, and when is it best applied in Hold'em? Clarified question title. |
|
Jan 26 |
suggested | suggested edit on What is the purpose of a continuation bet, and when is it best applied in Hold'em? |
|
Jan 26 |
comment |
Is it impolite to leave a cash game when I'm about to be the big blind? @chriskluis I'm not sure you've understood the question. Everyone here seems to accept that blinds are required for the game to work. |
|
Jan 26 |
revised |
added 45 characters in body |
