1. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

I would acknowledge their valuable answers while suggesting to them a better way of conducting themselves, keeping an eye on their behavior.

2. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?

let my case be heard in the comments so they will consider reopening

3. In your opinion, what do moderators do?

Moderators set an example for others on the site and help promote constructive, valuable discussion

4. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

Great, I feel that my discourse on the site has been pretty consistent since I joined.

5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?

I feel being a moderator sets the standard for others in terms of how we conduct ourselves on the site, unlike just having high rep

1. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

Depends on the nature of the comments generated and the question and answer. Each case would be different. Of course I would write the user, see what was up and see if we could improve.

2. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?

Generally I will assume other mods know what they are doing and will give them their space. If I strongly disagreed that a post should not of been removed, I would either vote to reopen or discuss it with the other moderator and maybe convince them to reopen the question.

3. In your opinion, what do moderators do?

Clean up spam, deal with inappropriate content, stay active on the site, give people their do, lead by example, and don't let it go to your head.

4. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

I am comfortable with that. I have ran a forum of my own in the past, and did not find a lot about being in that position particularly uncomfortable.

5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?

I think it is important to step up when one has the experience and qualifications to do a thing well. I love poker, and I love being here at SE Poker. As a moderator I feel I can bring more to this place then I can as a user. It is important to do duty.

1. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

As I have done in the past, I often engage with the user in the comments, explaining that thee comments have created a sense of tension. I have in the past engaged and attempted to educate around our rules and also to remind them that we're all here to learn. If the negative attitude continues I have and will take harsher action. Additionally context on what was said matters. Essentially the engagement should be proportional. Some things are worse and shouldn't be tolerated, while others often need just a reminder to continue to be friendly.

2. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?

Like most things in life, dialogue is really important to understand why someone did something and to engage with them. If a question was closed or deleted that I believe had value, I think the right approach here is to engage with the other mod, understand the reason they removed the question. They very well may have some valid points. Additionally I'd let them understand why I see value in the question, and hopefully we can reach an agreement on how we should move forward.

3. In your opinion, what do moderators do?

For the most part, moderation doesn't require a heavy hand. Most of what good moderation is about creating a space for the members to be able to discuss topics that fall within the definition of the SE scope. Part of moderation is to remind people of the rules from time to time, cool things down if they get heated, and in general offer a helping hand for members new and old. In essence create a space that has all members respected and things remain on topic.

4. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

For me I have always aimed to provide as good quality as I could in my answers and comments. I have always tried to treat members with respect and in a friendly manner. For me the diamond attached to my name carrying a different light I feel positive about that. I believe that up until this point I have represented myself well, helped grow the community and I believe my comments and posts stand to me. Of course on the other side I do also recognise that with the diamond I need to always keep things as cordial and respectful as I can as I am representing the SE.

5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?

To me I joined the PokerSE because I am passionate about Poker, and I have worked in the Poker industry in the past so I felt I had some things I could share. It has never been about reaching a certain reputation figure, it has always been something I've enjoyed immensely by contributing and learning from others. To me being a moderator allows me better than a high reputation score to support a community I have grown to really enjoy spending time in.

1. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

Regularly clear the comments.

2. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?

Discuss with the moderator to see if I can convince or be convinced and act accordingly.

3. In your opinion, what do moderators do?

Moderate.

4. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

Brilliant.

5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?

It will be quicker.

1. How would you deal with a user who produced a steady stream of valuable answers, but tends to generate a large number of arguments/flags from comments?

Good advice is often difficult to digest for a lot of people, especially if the delivery lacks nuance. I've had to handle a few cases of people not quite getting the tone right, despite their good intentions. Most of the time from my experience, a simple friendly comment, and a subtle edit here and there does the trick. We're all here to learn.

2. How would you handle a situation where another mod closed/deleted/etc. a question that you feel shouldn’t have been?

As I've done in the past, I will either ask in the chat channel, and/or post on Meta with my thoughts first. Asking each other to explain our decisions is pretty much the reason this site exists! Questions about moderation are no different.

3. In your opinion, what do moderators do?

Keep the quality of the info on the site high, and try to help those who use it have a good experience.

4. A diamond will be attached to everything you say and have said in the past, including questions, answers and comments. Everything you will do will be seen under a different light. How do you feel about that?

Felt good about it for 9+ years and still do.

5. In what way do you feel that being a moderator will make you more effective as opposed to simply reaching 10k or 20k rep?

From a technical perspective, it just means faster access to Admin rights. Personally I think it's easy for people with far less Rep than 10-20k to contribute in a meaningful way if Mods are attentive to flags, so I don't necessarily think there is a change in effectiveness that comes with Rep; It just means admin is easier and you gain more autonomy.