Timeline for Is it profitable to call an all-in on the flop with a straight draw?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2021 at 19:33 | history | edited | Adam Sharpe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 22 characters in body
|
| Feb 16, 2021 at 19:32 | comment | added | Adam Sharpe | @Alec Aha, understood, thanks. I've been using the term incorrectly then, to also include all-in situations (upon reflection I should have realized this is obviously wrong, since there's nothing "implied" about it). I'll edit my answer. | |
| Feb 16, 2021 at 19:11 | comment | added | Alec | Implied odds have no bearing on a situation where you've gone all-in before the rest of the cards come out. At that point you're just realizing your equity. Implied odds come from being able to make big bets after a strong hand has been made | |
| Feb 16, 2021 at 15:20 | comment | added | Adam Sharpe | @Alec I don't follow. I agree with you, and I think I'm saying the same thing... What did I write that was inconsistent with what you are saying? | |
| Feb 16, 2021 at 9:00 | comment | added | Alec | That's not what reverse implied odds are. Reverse implied odds are making your hand (say a straight) and then getting stacked because you made it (by lets say a flush) | |
| Feb 1, 2021 at 22:24 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 31, 2021 at 21:16 | history | answered | Adam Sharpe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |