Timeline for The need of calculating EV?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2014 at 2:43 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=1165 by developer User.Id=442 | |
| Dec 9, 2013 at 11:23 | answer | added | jmsimpson68 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 24, 2013 at 7:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPoker/status/404505337715519488 | ||
| Nov 19, 2013 at 12:11 | answer | added | Jorge Córdoba | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 9, 2013 at 1:09 | comment | added | Toby Booth | I find your calculation unintuitive but that's almost certainly due to my personal methodology. Check this Q out: poker.stackexchange.com/q/78/88 | |
| Nov 8, 2013 at 17:39 | comment | added | user1165 | Thanx but i dont know much about tournaments, i'm playing only 6-max online cash games. I know what are you talking about though, the slightest details can turn your tournament position for the better. But in my easier EV above isn't that enough to just know that A & B are "similar" and close to blinds, like -10 loss (if etc. BB is say 5) could mean "ok, lets call" and -40 means "nope". It would make any difference if i calc pot-odds and EV to cross-eval on a situation or they're different and EV more post-analysis stuff? | |
| Nov 8, 2013 at 15:35 | comment | added | Radu Murzea | The context might force you to fold, even if a call is CLEARLY +EV. Think of the bubble, for example. Or securing an extra $3000 because there's a super short stack at the table. In these cases, how big the plus or the minus is might be relevant. | |
| Nov 8, 2013 at 14:01 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 9, 2013 at 1:09 | |||||
| Nov 8, 2013 at 13:44 | history | asked | user1165 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |