Timeline for What is the minimum raise after an all-in?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2014 at 19:07 | history | edited | user1637 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
clarifying
|
| Jul 26, 2014 at 8:32 | history | edited | user1637 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed rule #2
|
| Jul 26, 2014 at 8:31 | comment | added | user1637 | I wrote the rule in an awkward way. In this example, UTG made more than a minraise, and UTG+1 didn't equal the minimum raise when going all-in. The legal minraise here is 9950, as UTG made a raise of +4900. I've edited my answer to take that into account. This link should help you : neilwebber.com/notes/2013/07/25/… | |
| Jul 26, 2014 at 2:35 | comment | added | Paul | That doesn't seem to make sense. Suppose the blinds are 50/100, then UTG raises to 5000, then UTG+1 goes all-in for 5050. Then the UTG+2 can't raise to 5150. I'm sure they would need to raise to at least 9900. I'm just not sure if it's 9900, 9950, 10000, or something else. | |
| Jul 25, 2014 at 21:49 | comment | added | user1637 | if blinds are 50/100 : 375. • If the previous raise amount was less than a big blind, then the minimum raise is equal to the big blind. | |
| Jul 25, 2014 at 21:43 | comment | added | Paul | My question is, what would BTN need to qualify as a raise in that situation? 350, 400, or 475? | |
| Jul 25, 2014 at 21:20 | history | edited | user1637 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added explanation
|
| Jul 25, 2014 at 21:08 | review | First posts | |||
| Jul 26, 2014 at 0:31 | |||||
| Jul 25, 2014 at 21:07 | history | answered | user1637 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |