Timeline for Should I call this river overbet with an overpair?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2017 at 21:04 | answer | added | Raymond | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 3, 2016 at 19:31 | answer | added | paparazzo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 7, 2016 at 3:41 | comment | added | user1934 | so did you call? did he have the low set? | |
| Nov 23, 2014 at 21:11 | answer | added | Jon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 21, 2012 at 10:27 | answer | added | Marcio | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 13, 2012 at 4:24 | answer | added | John Sonmez | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 11, 2012 at 4:18 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackPoker/status/168187063739490304 | ||
| Jan 30, 2012 at 2:11 | comment | added | Karl Knechtel | After making a larger turn bet, I would probably just shove the river myself. For live, deep-stacked play, the 3bet is probably too small, too. | |
| Jan 23, 2012 at 3:19 | comment | added | Chris Marasti-Georg | @Svisstack If I do post results, it will be well after the public beta starts - I want this question to have plenty of time for unbiased feedback. | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 22:50 | comment | added | Svisstack | @Chris Marasti-Georg: ok, but how this hand was ended;-) | |
| Jan 22, 2012 at 18:18 | answer | added | xyious | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 15, 2012 at 4:21 | history | edited | Chris Marasti-Georg |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 11, 2012 at 17:18 | answer | added | Chad | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 11, 2012 at 16:21 | history | edited | Chris Marasti-Georg |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 11, 2012 at 8:27 | answer | added | Toby Booth | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 21:55 | history | edited | Chris Marasti-Georg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added suits
|
| Jan 10, 2012 at 21:17 | comment | added | Chris Marasti-Georg | I agree, this will be much better once we have suit icons. | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 21:15 | comment | added | Chad | @MichaelMcGowan - I did not mean the hand history. I think if we get the card codes working that would probably make this more readable. I just look and see alot of initials and it made my head hurt. | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 21:10 | comment | added | Michael McGowan | @Chad If you are referring to the hand history format and things like QdQc, there's a meta question about that now. If you are talking about things like BB or UTG, I'm not sure it's wise to change those. Those are the accepted vernacular at least in the online community. | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 20:48 | answer | added | Michael McGowan | timeline score: 13 | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 20:48 | history | edited | Chris Marasti-Georg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatting
|
| Jan 10, 2012 at 20:45 | answer | added | Jeffrey Blake | timeline score: 10 | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 20:38 | comment | added | Jeffrey Blake | I agree that the turn bet is too small, for exactly the reasons you note. | |
| Jan 10, 2012 at 20:33 | history | asked | Chris Marasti-Georg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |