Timeline for How to play a pair against a maniac?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2017 at 20:05 | answer | added | paparazzo | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 25, 2015 at 8:24 | history | edited | Krzysztof Kazmierczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
demonstrated the positions
|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 19:52 | answer | added | jmsimpson68 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 19:25 | comment | added | jmsimpson68 | Why didn't you just go all-in on the flop? Why hold back 4.5BBs? Any the maniac - was he always going over the top or just a calling station? From this hand he's just a calling station. | |
| Nov 24, 2015 at 19:17 | comment | added | Dr.DrfbagIII | Just to be clear, you're in the small blind? For what reasons do you refer to the other player as "maniac"? You say he's been reraising you--has he had to show any hands? | |
| S Nov 24, 2015 at 18:04 | history | suggested | TmKVU | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
spelling and card formatting
|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 17:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 24, 2015 at 18:04 | |||||
| Nov 24, 2015 at 6:49 | history | edited | Krzysztof Kazmierczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added spoiler
|
| Nov 24, 2015 at 6:15 | history | asked | Krzysztof Kazmierczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |