Timeline for What measures can I take to verify that an online poker site has rigged hands?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2018 at 22:19 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 509 characters in body
|
| Jul 2, 2016 at 12:47 | comment | added | Toby Booth | "Cigital" are another firm that do auditing, specifically for Pokerstars. | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 19:02 | comment | added | paparazzo | @ChrisFarmer Interesting but not going to be enough data for statically analysis of randomness. | |
| Jul 1, 2016 at 18:50 | comment | added | Chris Farmer | FWIW, Bovada tournament hand histories disclose the hole cards of the players. You can at least get more information from histories like this, even though you only get hands that you participated in. The histories aren't available until after the tournaments are complete. | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:46 | comment | added | paparazzo | For the most part no. That would help humans but it would be more of an advantage to bots as a bot can process the data in near real time. The best model here is they submit data to a testing agency and you trust the testing agency. | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:40 | comment | added | Luis Masuelli | I'd like to focus on statistics matter. Do major online servers provide a history of observable results (showing only disclosed cards and no mucked cards)? | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:34 | comment | added | paparazzo | Your bigger risk is collusion. If just two players are disclosing hole cards you are at a disadvantage. If half the table is sharing hole cards you are at a huge disadvantage. | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:21 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 344 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:16 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 344 characters in body
|
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:13 | vote | accept | Luis Masuelli | ||
| Nov 5, 2018 at 19:56 | |||||
| Jun 30, 2016 at 14:11 | comment | added | Luis Masuelli | The distinction is so meaningful that you actually provided an answer which puts clear the distinction and even put numbers describing the impact of such distinction. | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 13:26 | comment | added | paparazzo | One reason on-line poker is not legal in the US is that it would be hard to regulate. But I still wish they would allow it. | |
| Jun 30, 2016 at 10:04 | history | answered | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |