My two cents is if you re-range them then you mess with the statistics.

You need to account for hands that could be a buff.

I would be more likely to add cards than take them away. Early positions comes in for a raise on 468 rainbow and leads on the flop and you had no 5 or 7 in their range then you need to consider that. But I would not take out AK sited or any pair.

If you over react to their actions you become exploitable and leave a more clear signature as a bot.

I would look at it more as Esfandiari says does it make sense. Did not bet the flop or turn but bet the river. If you take a way the busted hands that would do that in desperation I think you have a hole the size of Dallas in the algorithm.

Ranging is statistics but at some point you need to go with a GTO or machine learning type decision tree.

Hey that flush draw was only 20% but the way the hand was played is credible.

A bot to play against a low end player is so much different than a mid or high end.

My two cents is if you re-range them then you mess with the statistics.

You need to account for hands that could be a buff.

I would be more likely to add cards than take them away. Early positions comes in for a raise on 468 rainbow and leads on the flop and you had no 5 or 7 in their range then you need to consider that. But I would not take out AK sited or any pair.

If you over react to their actions you become exploitable and leave a more clear signature as a bot.

I would look at it more as Esfandiari says does it make sense. Did not bet the flop or turn but bet the river. If you take a way the busted hands that would do that in desperation I think you have a hole the size of Dallas in the algorithm.

Ranging is statistics but at some point you need to go with a GTO or machine learning type decision tree.

Hey that flush draw was only 20% but the way the hand was played is credible.

A bot to play against a low end player is so much different than a mid or high end.

Fool Pokerstars and Partypoker is another thing. The have some real smart people looking for patterns. And you have posted Open Source.

My two cents is if you re-range them then you mess with the statistics.

You need to account for hands that could be a buff.

I would be more likely to add cards than take them away. Early positions comes in for a raise on 468 rainbow and leads on the flop and you had no 5 or 8 in their range then you need to consider that. But I would not take out AK sited or any pair.

If you over react to their actions you become exploitable and leave a more clear signature as a bot.

I would look at it more as Esfandiari says does it make sense. Did not bet the flop or turn but bet the river. If you take a way the busted hands that would do that in desperation I think you have a hole the size of Dallas in the algorithm.

Ranging is statistics but at some point you need to go with a GTO or machine learning type decision tree.

Hey that flush draw was only 20% but the way the hand was played is credible.

A bot to play against a low end player is so much different than a mid or high end.

My two cents is if you re-range them then you mess with the statistics.

You need to account for hands that could be a buff.

I would be more likely to add cards than take them away. Early positions comes in for a raise on 468 rainbow and leads on the flop and you had no 5 or 7 in their range then you need to consider that. But I would not take out AK sited or any pair.

If you over react to their actions you become exploitable and leave a more clear signature as a bot.

I would look at it more as Esfandiari says does it make sense. Did not bet the flop or turn but bet the river. If you take a way the busted hands that would do that in desperation I think you have a hole the size of Dallas in the algorithm.

Ranging is statistics but at some point you need to go with a GTO or machine learning type decision tree.

Hey that flush draw was only 20% but the way the hand was played is credible.

A bot to play against a low end player is so much different than a mid or high end.