Timeline for Are there hands that are considered better for big tables rather than small ones
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2017 at 16:13 | comment | added | paparazzo | Don't want to edit and make this active. You are going to be playing some of these speculative heads up because you need to play more hands or get blinded off. | |
| Mar 5, 2017 at 22:53 | vote | accept | Dolev | ||
| Mar 3, 2017 at 17:45 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2017 at 15:08 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 355 characters in body
|
| Mar 3, 2017 at 13:08 | comment | added | 3N1GM4 | Went to chat a few times since you posted (including just a few minutes after you posted), but you were never there. | |
| Mar 3, 2017 at 7:35 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 279 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 23:08 | comment | added | paparazzo | Let us continue this discussion in chat. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 22:53 | comment | added | 3N1GM4 | No disrespect here, just couldn't find these lists with my own Google search, so figured other people might be in the same situation and would benefit from the detail. Seems somewhat spiteful to deny everyone the benefit of your research just because you feel one person has been disrespectful (although not sure what disrespect you think I've shown), never mind though. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 21:34 | comment | added | 3N1GM4 | Ok, a link to where you found the lists would probably be helpful to people if they want to understand better how they were constructed if this info is not in your answer. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 21:29 | comment | added | paparazzo | @3N1GM4 I just searched the WWW for hand order versus number of players and got those 2. I trust it is based on running Monte Carlo simulations and they matched my intuition. Not a chance of doing that as a calculation. I am not going to run simulations for a less than polite user. The point is less speculative holdings go up in value short handed. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 21:17 | comment | added | 3N1GM4 | Regardless of the previous comments, including the rationale and/or calculations which led to the lists would improve the answer greatly and be both interesting and useful to many I'm sure. | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 17:09 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 12:19 | comment | added | B. Alvn | I'm speaking for myself. Where did you get these lists? Out of your head, right? | |
| Mar 2, 2017 at 10:05 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 86 characters in body
|
| Mar 2, 2017 at 2:26 | comment | added | B. Alvn | Why would you put AK under 99? If you that is due to math, shouldn't it be below 22? And if it is due to playable or pretty much standard poker thinking, shouldn't it be between KK and QQ? I'm pretty sure every player in the world would prefer AKs to 99 or TT, despite the mathematical fact of it being below 22...And if 99 is better than AK, why would AJ be better than 88? I find these lists suspect. | |
| Mar 1, 2017 at 15:15 | history | edited | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 721 characters in body
|
| Mar 1, 2017 at 10:47 | history | answered | paparazzo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |