2

When considering the suit of the cards, 5 from 52 cards have 2598960 different combinations.

But how many different combinations are possible when neither suit nor order of the cards are considered? (E.g. 2d, 3s, 4h equals 4s, 3c, 2c)

2 Answers 2

3

quads: 13 * 12 = 156

full houses: 13 * 12 = 156

trips: 13 * 12 * 11 / 2 = 858

two pairs: 13 * 12 * 11 / 2 = 858

single pair: 13 * 12 * 11 * 10 / 6 = 2860

5 different cards: 13 * 12 * 11 * 10 * 9 / 120 = 1287

--

total: 6175

exemplary explanation for single pair:

13 possibilities for the rank of the pair, 12 possibilities for the first single card (the rank of the pair is not allowed), 11 possibilities for the rank for the second single card (ranks of pair and first single card are not allowed), 10 possibilities for the rank for the third single card. As the order of the cards is not considered, the resulting number 13*12*11*10 needs to be divided by the number 3! = 6 of permutations of the 3 single cards.

2
  • This looks correct, however could you please explain why with trips, two pairs and single pair you divide by 2, 2 and 6 respectively?
    – Raymond
    Jan 19, 2019 at 17:14
  • 1
    @RaymondTimmermans thanks for your feedback. I've added an explanation for the single pair to my answer. For two pairs we divide by two to make up for swapping the rank of the pairs. For trips we divide by two to make up for swapping the rank of the two single cards.
    – azimut
    Jan 19, 2019 at 18:51
1

My answer is incorrect. It addresses the amount of permutations, not combinations.

Ignoring suits makes things actually way easier, not harder. When suits don't matter you basically have thirteen possibilities on each card, five times. Equaling 13^5 = 371293 permutations. However there are a few permutations in here that are not possible and that is five of a kind. So we substract all five of a kind permutations, which are 13 in total, to get to our answer. 371280.

2
  • This is not correct, the number is too high. For example, you counted the hand 98765 in 5! = 120 ways (all permutations).
    – azimut
    Jan 19, 2019 at 16:07
  • You are right. I misread the question. Will try to update my answer asap.
    – Raymond
    Jan 19, 2019 at 16:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.