I have been playing PokerStars Play Money for a while now and I get the feeling that there are some patterns happening during games that make me lose trust on the level of randomness of the algorithm.

One pattern that I often see and I can't seem to get over it, is: when I'm not a big or small blind, I often get dealt suited cards on the hand, so I go for the flop as most seasoned players would do just in case you get 2 more of the kind on the flop or less probable but still possible the flash.

So I keep getting the filling that this is how the algorithm gets more players to buy into the flop instead of folding.

I would like to know if anyone else has noticed this or knows if this is common in online poker games, and also I would like to know which online poker site is the best based on algorithm performance/fairness to a true game.


  • You can see my answer here (poker.stackexchange.com/a/918/88) that PS uses an independent audit to verify its fairness. I believe this encompasses play money as well. Look up the term "rigged" in this site and you will find many answers all pointing toward fair play. – Toby Booth Apr 12 at 12:38
  • Thank you Toby :) – BobmasterStack Apr 12 at 13:14

There is no proof that Pokerstars algorythms are in any way "rigged". External auditory is performed on its dealing system.

Anyway you can ask for 15.000 extra chips every 4 hours so I don't think they're getting too much from players buying play money. The limit is probably set to prevent players from endlessly going all-in every hand

| improve this answer | |

It is powered by RNG (random number generator) and there never been any statistical anomalies over a long period of time, so you can be confident that they are not doing anything sketchy with it.

It is quite easy to notice these things for outside auditors, and scandal like that would put a huge blow to the whole company including their real money site, so I am pretty sure there is no reason for them to take this risk.

| improve this answer | |

It is highly unlikely that such an algorithm would really return more benefit than the cost of the developement it would need.

In my opinion, you are just seeing a false pattern, which the human mind does all the time with too small sample sizes. It's not the dealer algorithm's fault, having a suited hand is very common, but they only complete into a flush post-flop in 5% of the times.

So calling or even raising only to chase a flush is the problem you are having.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.