3

This is the definition of action only from Pokernews.com:

In many card rooms, with respect to an all-in bet, only a full bet is considered a legitimate wager, in terms of whether this constitutes a raise that can be re-raised. Anything less than a full bet is considered to be action only, that is, other players can call such a bet but not raise it. For example, Chloe bets $10. Henry calls. John goes all in for $14. When the bet gets back to Chloe, she is permitted only to call the extra $4; the same goes for John.

What I'm confused about is why it's called action only? Because according to the glossaries I've looked up, action means the betting within a poker hand and if I'm correct, this consists of a bet, a call, and a raise; but if I'm incorrect and that action is only limited to a bet, this still does not make sense to me considering the example given indicates that one is only permitted to call, so why call action only, why not call only? Am I missing something?

7

The best explanation I found was:

Action Only - An all-in wager which is not large enough to re-open the betting for someone who has already acted is referred to as action only (as opposed to a bet, which could be raised by someone who has already acted).

It's a little confusing. "Your Action" clearly states it's your turn to do something (bet, fold, raise, etc.). In this situation, your actions have been locked by the all-in. The All-in wasn't a raise, as the amount wasn't a legal raise, so instead we say it's "action only" and your choice is limited.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.