0

What happens if we have 4 players at the table with the following bets

-player1 10$ - all-in - Cards: 9d, 5h

-player2 50$ - all-in - Cards: 9h, 4h

-player3 100$ not all-in - Cards:2d,Kc

-player4 100$ not all-in - Cards:2h,Jh

Table cards:9s, 3d, 3s, Ac, 2c

During flop, player 4 raises to 100$. player1 and player2 go all-in. Player3 calls the bet. Player1 and player2 have the same formation rank and kickers, so they should win, but how much?

I assume that player1 takes 10$ from each player, so he wins 40$ /2 because he splits the first position with another player.

What about player2, player3 and player4?

3

You have 3 pots
$40 - player1, player2, player3, player4
$120 - player2, player3, player4
$100 - player3, player4

Hand order
1 - Player1 Player2 tie 9933A
2 - Player3 Player4 tie 3322A

Player1 and Player 2 split the $40 pot
Player2 wins the $120 pot
Player3 and Player4 spit the $100 pot

  • The cards/hands of each player is written above at the end of each line. Player3 has pair of 2 and pair of 3, with ACE kicker. Player4 has the same as player3. – NVG Feb 12 '16 at 15:32
  • 1
    Would this assumption be true: the best hand from each side pot wins that pot or splits it with other players from the pot that have the same formation rank – NVG Feb 12 '16 at 15:59
  • Yep, if they have equivalent hands and an equal amount of money in the pot, they would split their side pot(s). – Chris Farmer Feb 12 '16 at 16:02
  • 1
    @nvg OK? I assumed the $100 in text on the river was in addition. I edited the answer. Yes, pots should total bets. – paparazzo Feb 12 '16 at 17:53
  • 1
    That action would typically not happen on the river. You might want to just take the rive part out of the question. – paparazzo Feb 12 '16 at 18:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.