Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with poker-theory
Search options not deleted
user 4046
Poker theory is generally based on mathematical principals to define the theory.
2
votes
Question on Strategy Calculation (from Bill Chen's Book Math of Poker)
I have been struggling over the same example for the same reason.
Let P(A) = Prob A has nuts = 0.2,
P(A') = Prob A has dead hand = 0.8,
P(B) = Prob A bets,
P(A'|B) = Prob A has dead hand given A b …
- 31
1
vote
Question on Strategy Calculation (from Bill Chen's Book Math of Poker)
I think I've got it:
The formula used in the book MUST assume the player A has NOT already bet, which I don't think is made very clear in the book at all. I don't think this is what was intended, sin …
- 31