Timeline for NL100: Turn Two-Pair at Wet Board Facing Small Bets
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 11, 2017 at 20:03 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPoker/status/884865684886306817 | ||
Jul 11, 2017 at 16:04 | answer | added | paparazzo | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 14, 2012 at 18:23 | answer | added | wilfra | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 8, 2012 at 6:21 | answer | added | Chris | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 5, 2012 at 0:30 | answer | added | Silversana | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 22:06 | history | edited | Toby Booth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Clarified title and description of opponent.
|
Dec 4, 2012 at 22:04 | comment | added | Toby Booth | I'll edit the title. But to say we have a small sample and then assume it's clear he's fishy... I don't agree. :) | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 19:47 | comment | added | Silversana | I think the title is a bit misleading because while he may have TAGish stats you only have a small sample and his stack size and play in this hand make it really clear he's a fish. | |
Dec 4, 2012 at 18:05 | history | asked | Toby Booth | CC BY-SA 3.0 |